![oacapture gamma control oacapture gamma control](https://desktopnerds.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/gammacontrolpackv5.png)
Sources providing monochromatic fast neutron beams, such as DD or DT sources (also in the form of portable devices) are used for many applications, including at industrial level. Neutrons made available at large scale facilities extend from ultra-cold to fast neutrons. Detectors are then essential for the development of new and effective instrumentation that in turn can trigger new ideas for science. Together with the development of intense sources and sophisticated instruments, the role of neutron detection techniques is instrumental for an effective use of the intense fluxes of neutron beams that became available in the last three decades. The advent of scattering techniques, firmly linked to instrument development (diffractometers, spectrometers), made neutron science attractive for scientists working in different fields, such as physics, biology, chemistry and engineering. The possibility to reveal structure and dynamics at different scales of distances and times, provided a deep insight into the microscopic nature of condensed matter systems. Neutron-based experimental techniques have been continuously improved, refined and strengthened since the pioneering experiments conducted by Clifford Shull and Bertram Brockhouse in the mid twentieth century. The studies’ outcomes indicate the potential of prompt gamma-ray to carry out the sealed sources applications of gamma transmission measurements and imaging. Furthermore, results for prompt gamma computed tomography (CT) were presented and discussed. The images were compared to images obtained from simulations of gamma transmission measurement using 60Co. The detected gamma-ray spectra were analysed, and images of the two phases inside the pipes were produced. Two simulations were run for each pipe, with and without mixing the liquid phase with the stable isotope 157Gd.
Oacapture gamma control code#
Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code (MCNP5) was used to simulate the irradiation of two-phase flow pipes by 252Cf neutron source. This work proposes to replace gamma-ray from radioisotopes with prompt gamma-ray from the interaction of neutrons with stable isotopes injected into the industrial process or with the structural material of the industrial process equipment. Offering alternative gamma-ray sources can support the technology by complementing sources’ availability and radiation safety. (I have to confess, it's easier to get to the Raw controls with a control surface, and that does help.Radioisotope applications in industrial process inspection and evaluation using gamma-ray emitters provide otherwise unavailable information. Trying to colorgrade entirely in Raw is insane and just takes much, much too much time.
![oacapture gamma control oacapture gamma control](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/TjcAAOSw9uFW-Zly/s-l640.jpg)
Their conclusion was it was best just to set a basic overall look in Raw, then do 99% of everything else with the traditional Resolve controls. MixingLight had a good comparison of what you could and could not do in the Raw controls a couple of years back.
Oacapture gamma control windows#
I would always prefer setting ISO, exposure, and color temp with the Raw controls, and then doing everything else with the curves, gain (LGG and Log), keys, windows and so on within Resolve. When done in Raw, you get a different effect than lift/gamma/gain. I think this is true except for the color temperature controls. If there's a difference, nobody could see it. the usual primary wheels, contrast controls, etc. John Paines wrote:Bosh! Back in the cdng days, some of us tried comparing the effectiveness of raw controls v. My guess at first they want to keep gamma controls in both color managed and non color managed workflows, but after further testing those additional controls may produce some artifacts during extreme color transforms so they remove it from color managed workflow.
![oacapture gamma control oacapture gamma control](https://www.softportal.com/scr/5897/gamma-control-big-2.gif)
Same goes to DNG - in YRGB color managed timeline it looks less saturated with less perfect colors but same time produce less artifacts during color correction. In YRGB color managed workflow Resolve gives us most untouched "raw" starting point for further color correction and transforms with secondary Resolve tools because those "gamma controls" are disabled. Earlier when working with DNG on YRGB (non color managed) timeline video also looks more vivid and saturated because some kind of factory color correction profile was already applied, but there where no custom control sliders for it. This probably designed for simpler workflow but makes RAW output less "raw" because color correction was already applied. In YRGB (non color managed) you have those "gamma controls" sliders that acts like color correction build into. My guess BM wants to keep here same logic as with DNG and give us two options for RAW: